The Shift to Remote Work: Understanding Employee Sentiment and Engagement

 

The shift in remote work has massively affected how employees connect with the work, colleagues, and organizations. This culture of remote working-forced by the COVID-19 pandemic to be established as a necessity in many businesses-has shown how it can be used effectively for the longer term. While most consider hybrid or fully remote models, the shift brings with it immense challenges: how to keep employee engagement going. This article will draw on a number of HRM theories to examine how homeworking influences employees' sentiment about, and engagement with, their work, and considers what organizations might usefully do to accommodate the change (State of Remote Work, 2021) .

 

1.      The Rise of Remote Work

 What earlier was considered a fringe benefit is slowly becoming an intrinsic part of the work structure for any organization. Indeed, according to Owl Labs, by 2025  more than 70 percent of the workforce will be working remotely for at least five days every month. In this adjustment, they will have greater flexibility in combining their home and professional lives. This also created some problems with employee engagement- probably isolating them and causing disengagement with the general culture because of a lack of face-to-face interaction.

  

2.      Employee Engagement: A Critical HR Challenge

 Engagement can be described as the emotional and intellectual commitment to one's organization. Thus, engaged employees are more productive and loyal; hence, they can be very contributory to the company's goals. It is challenging to maintain high levels of engagement within remote settings. The “Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model” applies here as it points to how job demands necessarily need to be well balanced with job resources. This is because working remotely tends to accentuate the demands of the job, such as blurred boundaries between work and personal life, while at the same time reducing some of the critical resources, such as peer support and managerial feedback. Unless the organization takes steps to correct this new imbalance, employee engagement may well devolve into burnout or disengagement (Demerouti & Bakker, n.d. 2011).

 

Josh Vesely, SVP Randstad SourceRight, joins Trinity Nguyen of UserGems on The First 100 Days podcast to share insights on improving and sustaining employee engagement in a remote/hybrid world

 

3.      Self-Determination Theory and Employee Motivation 

The important concepts explaining virtual work and engagement include one quite well-acknowledged, called "Self-Determination Theory (SDT)", which links autonomy, competence, and relatedness to motivation. Working virtually often means more autonomy since people can control their immediate environment and schedule. That kind of flexibility empowered me when working from home, and it was possible to manage my time according to the principles of SDT. But over time, the lack of interpersonal interaction rendered me less related-one salient element of SDT-and lonely.

Contrasting this, my organization instituted virtual meetings every week and frequent check-ins, which increased my connectedness and engagement manifold. That is in line with "Kahn's Engagement Theory," which explains that meaningful interpersonal relationships form the bedrock of employee engagement. A virtual work environment should always make sure these relationships are formed through routine communications and team-building activities so that it would help in sustaining levels of engagement (Deci, Olafsen, & Ryan, 2017; Kahn, 1990).

 

4.      Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory: Addressing Motivation and Hygiene 

"Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory" sheds more light on challenges with maintaining engagement in remote environments. According to Herzberg, satisfaction with one's job may be determined by two sets of factors: motivators (e.g., achievement, recognition of achievement) and hygiene factors (e.g., work conditions and pay).Working remotely can increase motivation by giving workers more autonomy and accountability, but it can also have a detrimental effect on hygiene aspects, particularly if an individual lacks a conducive workspace or faces technical difficulties. Thus, ensuring that employees have everything they need to work effectively and comfortably from home is considered very important to avoid dissatisfaction and ensure engagement (Herzberg, 1966).

 

In my own experience, a facilitative context of proper technology and ergonomic workplaces dampened the negative effects caused by remote work. The indications here demonstrate that an organization has to invest in both motivators and hygiene factors affecting engagement.

 

5.      Social Exchange Theory and Organizational Commitment 

According to "Social Exchange Theory", the employer-employee relationship is based on the principle of reciprocity. Workers are more willing to engage in their work and to be committed to staying with an organization whenever they are valued and looked after. As an organization cannot be proximal with others through a virtual environment, it demands the building of a healthy foundation for the principle of reciprocity among virtual employees. A very good example of this includes flexibility and recognition extended to employees which strengthens commitment and involvement (Enayat et al., 2022; Homans, 1958).

In my company, regular virtual check-ins, at least at the outset, made it clear that employee well-being mattered; it gave me the motivation and loyalty to a higher level. Of note in such a reciprocal relationship, and in effect making sure the level of engagement in virtual work is high, is based on the premise that employees feel valued and their efforts acknowledged.

 

6.      Vroom’s Expectancy Theory: Aligning Effort with Rewards 

“Vroom's Expectancy Theory” suggests that individuals are motivated when they perceive that a good effort will result in desired performance and, thereafter, in desired rewards. Undoubtedly, in virtual settings, clear-cut communication of goals, expectations, and performance outcomes becomes extremely vital. Without face-to-face interactions, employees may not be able to visualize how their work fits within the larger objectives of the organization-and that wears away at engagement (Vroom, 1964).

 

Organizational success needs to be communicated to the remote employee to maintain motivation. The feedback to employees, as well as performance reviews, should be carried out regularly to assure their contribution to the organizational goal and that they are duly compensated for their efforts.

 

7.      Equity Theory and Fair Treatment 

Generalizing, equity theory relies on perceptions of fairness relating to work effort and rewards. With working at home, this theory will be brought even more into context when employees working at home may feel their contribution and presence are not valued or taken seriously enough in comparison with other office-based workers. Therefore, it is important that the organization will not remove the remote employee from equal opportunities, recognition, or resources in order not to create equity feelings with them (Adams & Freedman, 1976).

It was assured through periodic performance reviews and a discussion of further opportunities in career development. This raised my engagement level and developed a greater perception of organizational justice, where each and every employee feels their worth, irrespective of location (Chan, 2000).

 

8.      Organizational Justice and Remote Employee Trust 

Organizational Justice Theory is primarily concerned with procedural justice, interactional justice and the administration of outcome in an organisational environment. Teleworking depends more on communication and process documentation to make decision teleworking to be inclusive. Far away employees are more likely to perceive they are left out from important decisions that affect them and the belief of unfairness will erode their trust and commitment (Colquitt et al., 2001).

 

An organization that is both procedurally and interactively fair would ensure that in the communication process everybody is equal regardless if you are in the office or working from home in particular aspect of the organizational structure in regards to information access, and resources. People working remotely need to know what is going on at work and get updates frequently, and that is why decision making should also be transparent. 

 

9.      The Role of Social Identity Theory in Remote Work 

“Social Identity Theory”: This theory seeks to explain how people get some of the selves they have from a collective identification process. The anonymous and isolation related to remote work results in having no sense of belonging as an employee and the organization and its cultures. Examining the level of team integration within the scope of virtually facilitated team-building activities, as well as including everybody in the communication, enhances the state of the remote working employees ’ sense of belonging noticeably (Huddy, 2001).

 

Since I noted that I can work while in remote location, the virtual team building activities implemented were one of the factors that I used that improved my relationship with the organization to improve engagement level with the organization. I felt like I was in a team and it inspired me to contribute in achieving certain achievements without necessarily seeing the physical exercise the team was undertaking.

 

            10. Practical Engagement Strategies in Remote Work 

It is the organization's responsibility to take proactive action by employing strategies that will retain employee engagement in a virtual environment. According to "Harvard Business Review", shared experiences of communication with each other across time zones, creating opportunities for and acknowledging employees' contributions to the company, are some important elements of remote worker engagement (No, Remote Employees Aren’t Becoming Less Engaged, 2023). Whereas some planned activities, such as training programs aimed at improving job knowledge and bringing about changes in social behavior, could reduce the gap created by working remotely, it will at the same time help increase employee engagement.

Training programs, by contrast, can reach the organizational objectives while sustaining organizational sources of commitment thanks to employees who can be more connected and involved. Being both engaging and performant in a team context would have required a lot of social interaction given that the nature of the work obliged me to pay at least one monthly on-site visit and perform virtual rendezvous checks almost every other week.

 

 

Simon Sinek discusses insights on how the landscape of remote work is evolving and what organizations can do to adapt effectively.

 

 Closing Thoughts: The Future of Remote Work and Engagement 

As remote work is here to stay, companies will have to adapt-not just processes and tools around it-but create new strategies with regard to retaining employees' engagement. By applying HRM theories like the “JD-R Model”, “Self-Determination Theory”, and “Social Exchange Theory” for better understanding of employee sentiment, we can design more targeted strategies in order to improve the engagement of our employees, thus helping us frame the HR practice more strategically. In the new normal of working remotely, a regular flow of communication will be key, as well as equity and recognition, to motivate and keep employees productive and engaged.

 

References

·        Mutongerwa, N. F., & Matebese, H. (2024). Dynamics of Remote Working: A Human Resource Management Headache and Test of Time. International Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 11(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.14445/23939125/ijems-v11i1p102  [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        No, Remote Employees Aren’t Becoming Less Engaged. (2023, March 24). Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/12/no-remote-employees-arent-becoming-less-engaged [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        State of Remote Work 2021 | Owl Labs. (n.d.). https://www.owllabs.com/state-of-remote-work/2021 [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        UFHRD. (n.d.). Scientific Mothering: Workload negotiations for early and mid- career researchers in an Athena Swan gold-awarded department  - Research at York St John. https://ray.yorksj.ac.uk/id/eprint/10229 [Accessed 10 October 2024].

·        Adams, J. S., & Freedman, S. (1976). Equity Theory Revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. In Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 43–90). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60058-1 [Accessed 10 October 2024].

·        Chan, M. (2000). ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE THEORIES AND LANDMARK CASES. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 8(1), 68–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb028911 [Accessed 09 October 2024].

·        Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (n.d.). The Job Demands-Resources model: challenges for future research, (2011). https://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?pid=S2071-07632011000200001&script=sci_arttext [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        Enayat, T., Ardebili, M. M., Kivi, R. R., Amjadi, B., & Jamali, Y. (2022). A computational approach to Homans Social Exchange Theory. Physica a Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 597, 127263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127263 [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        Huddy, L. (2001). From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory. Political Psychology, 22(1), 127–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00230 [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/256287 [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        Lee, S. (2007). Vroom’s expectancy theory and the public library customer motivation model. Library Review, 56(9), 788–796. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242530710831239 [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        Robertson, F. (2016). Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, 173–176. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315585697-24 [Accessed 14 October 2024].

·        Owl Labs. (2021). State of Remote Work: 2021 Report. Retrieved from https://www.owllabs.com/state-of-remote-work/2021 [Accessed 06 October 2024].

·        Business Review. (2020). How to Keep Remote Workers Engaged. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2022/08/keeping-hybrid-employees-engaged [Accessed 06 October 2024].

·